Centuries 5 Quatrain 02 (C.V Q.02)

Quatrain Lists eMail Link My Rules etc My Web Site My e-Books Nostradamus' Centuries 5 Quatrain 02   The text of this verse clearly relates to a set of divisions that prevail at different stages of a great contest. The anagrams of line four imply this contest is a parliamentary debate over how Nostradamus' quatrains can be fitted into the concept of the trinity or vice versa. The end point involves an expansion of the trinity into a set of four. There are many numbers in this verse with seven, three and two being in the text and anagrams for fourteen and four being in different lines and each number is an important definer of the debate. The seven conspirators at the banquet identify an attempt to place part of Ursae Majoris (Septentrionis) into the context of representing one who was in attendance at the Last Supper. Already tradition has the apostles representing the twelve signs of the zodiac but if Jesus and the Holy Spirit are added fourteen signs are needed in total. When at a future date this is attempted the relationship of the Holy Trinity no longer can be upheld by the Ship of the modern Church since it remains unprepared to accept Jesus and the Holy Spirit as purely mortal or astral-symbols. What starts as acceptance of the division between those of the Arian-Judaic-Islamic and Christian Orthodox views then flares into religious self-destruction when one party uses self-belief to try and force submission upon its opponents. Even the futile war which Nostradamus forecasts in his Prophecies and Prefaces doesn't resolve the issue. A Nicean-like council at the end of this century unsatisfactorily revises the concept of the Trinity but instead of unity or a duality replacing the trinity there will be a quaternity. So the essence of the verse is the future controversy over which of Ursae Majoris, Draconis, Ophiuchus or Eridanus can be interpreted as representing Jesus and the Holy Spirit in the ancient texts alongside the zodiac signs used for the apostles. Erkia Cheetham comments at the end of her presentation of this verse I [Erica C.] cannot decipher this verse. The last line has the word 'mail' for which there is no old meaning; only a modern one of email. And the word 'Denier' is used in the same line and this means to disclaim or deny. Both have such modernity that they make the verse indecipherable to those who seek its meaning in older French. C.V Q.02 Seven conspirators at the banquet will cause to flee  The iron out of the ship against the three: One will have the two fleets brought to the great leaders As with an email he denies the shot is to the forehead. Seps conjures au banquet feront luire Contre les trois le fer hors de nauire L'vn les deux cla$$es au grand fera conduire Quant par le mail. Denier au front luy tire. Anagram Clusters contained in French text <preceSs until><ursae j preceSsion><aauuebrs jcon not frequent><banq on fourteen pictureleSs><subaquean journ(i)es>  <onCe eridanus letters><free hordes><electron stories feel eridanus><or eridanus herself loiters> <and laSS argues fear excludes><and cofear ruined><un-rivalled fear excludes dracon> <parliament Denial><Quatrein ampler iDeal t(r)uly not unfairer> <four end era in parliamental Querulity [bickering]><unt(y)l Quaternity [four sets]><fortun-ately in Quatrein ampler ideal>