The religion of the name of the Seas

The religion of the name of the seas.

There is no doubt that the nature of my writings is bizarre, since it seems impossible that the anagrams I have identified should occur, especially in English. The easiest action for any reader is to assume that it is too impossible and therefore isn’t worthy of any further thought. However it isn’t unknown for events considered impossible to be proven right. Stones falling from the sky, a cannon-ball not falling faster than a light pebble, the sun being more than 4,000 years old, the speed of light being the highest speed possible, all were once thought impossible. And in each case the contemporary reasoning behind this way of thinking seemed reasonable. What changed the essence of each debate was evidence. It isn’t to say that all bizarre observations are then going to change our perception of the world or universe but observation is indeed the cornerstone of change. But there is still a fundamental rule that applies to every change in thought and that is that any evidence presented must lay within an envelope of consistency with all that we already know about the world.

In an earlier section I highlighted that we can’t expect to gain full insight into events we can change and this is one of the consistencies in logic that must be applied to my evidence. To say that it is impossible to see full details of any change can be fairly claimed because it is based on an immutable foundation; the future can’t be the future if you can change it. Equally any detail that unfolds from Nostradamus’ writing applies to the immutable and neither Nostradamus nor I claim any more than that. Of course this leaves many enigmas but the resolution of these lies in the future at a time when the evidence is no longer in dispute. However there can be no revelation by me about the coming war that any living person can use to their advantage, and this isn’t a contrarian act but a barrier to knowledge and it is the same sort of barrier that confronted Nostradamus.

In much of the analyses I have shown considerable detail that will make it easier to judge both Nostradamus and my own writings but whenever I search for the participants in the wars of this century I find that there are constant barriers. I know the verses in which the answers most likely lie, but that is as far as I can go. Two such verses are worthy of mention here as they illustrate my point. The first of these is one of the verses with strong statements about the role of a sect.

C.10 Q.096
Religion du nom des mers vaincra…………The Religion of the name of the seas will win out
Contre la Secte fils Adaluncatif…………….Against the sect of the son of Adaluncatif:
Secte obStinee deploree craindra…………. The stubborn, lamented sect will be afraid
Des deux bleSSez par Aleph et Aleph……. Of the two wounded by Aleph and Aleph.

The second line of this verse is full of anagrams such as faction and infector that tie it into my theme of the sects as outlined earlier but it also holds the key to verses that enlighten Nostradamus’ text. The first of these of any importance is the anagram for nautical (aluncati) since nautical is the word applied to name objects and persons found on the seas. There are four other places where this same word occurs as an anagram and one of these is verse C.10 Q.68 Line 1 which says: The army of the sea will stand before the city, (L'armee de mer deuant la cite tiendra). In both the above cases where this anagram occurs there is the reference to those of the sea and in each the anagram of nautical exists independently of these words. But in the second example there is also an anagram of the word Atlantic(antlacit). And through this link another verse is connected to these two since C.3 Q,79 line 4 contains both nautical and Atlantic and its wording says The city taken, the enemy at the same time (La cite prinSe l’ennemy quant et quant). Significantly these last two lines of verse are the only two that contain an anagram for Atlantic. There are other links but those presented here show the reason why I conclude the religion of the name of the seas relates to Western religions based around the Atlantic. Following this trail I can identify Marseilles as the city under threat (C.3 q.79 L.3) but I could also show that the threat is once again from anti-particles (C.3 Q,79 line 4 ant la cite prins). However this takes me away from my point in presenting the original verse about these sects.

The second line of C.10 Q.96 holds some powerful strings of adjacent anagrams that build a consistent picture. They say Asad.lunatic.sect.alter.life Salafid.telecaster stifle.tolerances. There can be little argument that this is new material that aptly applies to the themes I find in Nostradamus’ Prophecies but despite all this detail it tells us nothing that we can use to change events even if it is totally valid. All we have is the guide to the proponents in what is about to enfold. All those who have attended sporting events will know that form guides and lists of players tell you nothing about the way the game will twist and turn.